Pahlavī Sitāyī dar Tarāzū-yi Tārīkh: Persiska (Farsi) 1400

In the course of developments after the victory of the Islamic revolution, some survivors of the Pahlavi regime and Westerners aligned with that regime, as well as some later opponents of the regime, in a completely political and non-scientific approach, justified and praised the regime that all sections of the Iranian people after fifty years After seven years of observing and touching its achievements, they considered its existence as contradictory and contrary to their dignity, authority, independence and historical identity, and in a unique consensus, they consigned it to history. The present article briefly criticizes the mentioned approach in two parts. The first part, firstly, with a historical review of the developments before and after the Islamic revolution and analyzes how the formation of political currents were formed in the stage after the victory of the revolution from a political sociological point of view, to examine the origin, motivation, and nature of the Pahlavi movement and its contradictions and contradictions. The crises and challenges that this current is facing from a scientific point of view to justify the legitimacy and efficiency and the fall of the Pahlavi regime have been discussed.