همبستگی اجتماعی و دشمنان آن : مکتب موس و دورکیم در برابر فایده‌گرایی و فاشیسم فارسی 1400

In Iran, the grounds of the formation of Durkheim's school and also its continuation in France are not well known, and this issue has basically made the radical narrative of Durkheim, in the opinion of most Iranian sociologists, influenced by Parsonsian's reading of Durkheim, to be far from mind. The present work is an attempt to overcome the dominant understanding of Durkheim in Iranian sociology and open the way for a radical reading of him and his followers... In general, the Durkheimian school, both against the atomization caused by neoliberal and utilitarian policies and against the fascist and identity-seeking reactions of mass and insecure societies, whose members seek refuge in authoritarian figures to achieve all their needs, from social reorganization and the formation of institutions Wasit has defended like guilds, unions and associations. According to them, the existence of secondary groups between the government and individuals prevents the creation of a mass society and a totalitarian state. Social organization from below in various formats such as associations, guilds, syndicates, cements and other social organizations and their participation in social and political life is necessary for the formation of democracy and its survival.