Hamrāhī-yi Fuqahā bā 'Uqalā: Pānzdah Maqālah: Persiska (Farsi) 1403

Islamic law is based on a part of the Quran and Sunnah that was formed in the first two centuries of the advent of Islam. From the fourth century, Shiite jurists began to formulate jurisprudence to understand the Sharia by pondering the verses and narrations, and often tried not to deviate from the framework of contemporary people's understanding of legislation and explanation. However, the developments that occurred in people's lives centuries later challenged some of these fatwas of jurists. Today, by paying more attention to the difference between the era of legislation and explanation and the modern era, and the influence of time and place on the issues of rulings, some fatwas can be ignored, and new fatwas can be reached for some issues. By reviewing the evidence for some jurisprudential rulings, it is possible to present a manifestation of the Quran and Sunnah that does not contradict rationality, does not put narration and reason face to face, and pays attention to the great role of custom in deducing and implementing rulings. The association of jurists with rationality is the result of jurisprudential efforts in the modern era and removes many of the rational forms of jurisprudence. This book contains a collection of fifteen articles written with such an approach.