'alayhah ham'dilī (kitab-ī barāy-i mihrabānī-yi manṭiqī: Persian 1401

Who can oppose empathy? What is wrong with empathy for others? In the book Against Paul's Empathy, Professor Bloom of Yale University talks about his research on empathy and its effect on human social life. He explains how empathy can be a motivation for injustice in society. Empathy is an irrational and whimsical emotion that instills a selfish point of view in humans. It contaminates the judgment and as a result, it ends in cruelty, and man performs best when he makes decisions and behaves without relying on empathy and with the help of ethics. In fact, what really expanded was not the circle of empathy, but the circle of rights and justice; The right that other living beings, no matter how far or different they are, should be safe from human harm and exploitation. According to Paul Bloom, most of us are wrong about empathy. Using clinical studies, he claims that empathy is a poor guide to morality. Bloom says in the book's introduction, I want to discuss the value of reasoning and thinking in everyday life, to argue that we should use our brains more than our hearts. So if you wish for a world where people care about a refugee as much as they care about their relatives, don't blame the lack of empathy; Rather, blame fanatical empathy