Sanjish-i Payāmad'hā-yi Hastī'shināsī-yi Hāydigir: Persian 1402

The method of this comparative research in confronting Heidegger's thought and evaluating Fardid's reading of it is to interpret and criticize the intellectual confusions and moral and political consequences of his legacy. From Heidegger in rethinking the temporal and historical "meaning" of being, a new understanding of the sacred and the sphere of art, criticizing the dominance of the mind-based and technocratic, coexistence in the "camp" of being and, most importantly, rethinking another lifestyle in a world worthy of human dignity and … you can learn a lot. But one should be able to think "with" and "against" Heidegger and not forget to criticize the "shadow" consequences of that thought, that is, "cognitive depersonalization" and "predestination historicism". The ontological gap of the world of cultures or global civilizations and the understanding of the importance of historical periods and epistemological breaks and the relativity of knowledge and discourses dominant in each era and the necessity of deconstructing hasty combinations as a condition for the possibility of any mental communication or real social dialogue, are aspects of the strength of Heidegger's philosophical question and the legacy of reading. Fardid Irani is from Heidegger. But cultural-civilizational essentialist identitarianism can turn philosophical questioning into a fundamentalist approach and defender of the return of traditional and political civilized sovereignty.