از مصدق تاریخی تا مصدق اسطوره‌ای الفارسية 1403

The debate about August 28 and Mossadegh's record started after him, and as mentioned, it continues to this day, and the evidence shows that it is unlikely to end soon, and Iranians, or at least their leaders, have a consensus about Mossadegh and his legacy. reach a relative level, as they have reached for example about many other historical figures such as Cyrus the Great or Shah Abbas or Amir Kabir or Qaim Maqam Farahani or Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk. But why is that? Why is Mossadegh and his record so controversial? To what extent does the media, books and artworks of this Iranian politician match his reality? He didn't live two thousand years ago, so why are there so many inconsistencies between the narrations about him? Ali Asghar Seyedabadi, a researcher and writer, in his latest work titled "From Mossadegh Historical to Mythical Mossadegh", which was recently published by Eger Publishing House, has done a very interesting and original work and instead of dealing with the story of August 28 itself, a work that thousands of previous works have done. from it - he has looked after it and has criticized and investigated how Mossadegh was made a myth or fiction in the heart of media narratives and literary depictions. On this occasion, we had a conversation with him, which is worth mentioning.